We checked all 1,034 tracked accounts for the week of July 27 to August 2, 2026. 129 items crossed our line across twelve arenas. Seventy-seven of them run six distinct scripts and the rest stand alone. Forty-three of those items respond to a single event, the July 31 mass crossing into Spain's Ceuta enclave. A second script runs on no event at all: Jewish people addressed as one group acting in concert, applied to whatever subject was at hand. In one script we could document the organizing: a funder we could identify, and speakers who shared a stage. In the other five we found accounts converging on the same framing, and we could not establish an organizing link between those accounts. That is a limit on what we can show, not a finding that nobody organized them.
Reach and coordination are different measurements, and this week they point in different directions. The six scripts carry 38,532,431 platform-reported impressions between them, and 27.3 million of that sits in a single script: the framing of the July 31 crossing into Spain's Ceuta enclave as an armed invasion. On this script alone, sitting legislators in two countries and the owner of X carried that framing. That script scored 4.58 of 5, the highest severity in the week, and it is one of two that reached our top tier. That total is counted across the 61 of the scripts' 77 items that carry a figure we could measure. The single script where we can document coordination, a Glasgow street-patrol campaign with a named funder and speakers sharing one stage, carries no reach figure at all. Read that as unmeasured, not as small.
Scripts by severity
Click a bar for the full scorecards.
The week's weather, day by day
One dot per real event. Filled dots drew a reaction we confirmed; hollow ones drew none we recorded. Click for the full board.
The 129 items, by harm level
Click for the full ledger.
On the radar
Click a date for the full calendar and the patterns building toward it.
01 · The scripts
Five factors are scored from 1 to 5: reach, toxicity, coordination, mainstreaming risk, and harm potential. Their composite Ember Priority Score is shown on a chart running from 0 to 5. Click one for its scorecard. Peak severity this week is 4.58, and two of the six scripts reached the top tier.
02 · The ledger
Click a row for the quote, the coding, and the source.
03 · The week's weather
The events we recorded no reaction to matter as much as the ones we did. Together they show which stories these narratives picked up this week and which they passed over.
04 · On the radar
This is the first week the hate side can carry this comparison. Its narratives were recorded as structured records for the first time last week. A script absent from this list has no record from an earlier week to compare against, which is not a statement that it has no history.
13 narratives we carded last week are not carded this week. We do not read that as decay. A narrative can be absent because it lost its carriers, because it did not clear the bar this week, or because this week's collection did not surface it. These records cannot separate those, so we report the absence and stop there.
| Narrative | Continues | Tier | Coordination |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antisemitic conspiracy blaming Israel and Jewish people for the Ceuta crossing | Jewish covert control of institutions and outcomes | no change | no change |
| 'Remigration' as a shared deportation slogan | Remigration: Europe belongs to Europeans by descent | no change | no change |
| Glasgow vigilante patrols and the 'Unite the Clans' rally | Britain is being invaded and colonised, and they must go (standing carriage) | no change | overt coordination |
Each line is one narrative compared with itself a week earlier, joined on a key assigned when the narrative was first carded rather than on any similarity between the two weeks' text. The two instruments are reported separately and never combined into a single direction, because they measure different things on different scales.
05 · Method
This is a purposive monitoring sample: all 1,034 accounts on our roster, spanning 23 ideological categories, checked in full every week. It is not a random slice of the internet. It misses anything posted off our roster, and anything a roster account did not post. A hit is language that collectivizes, dehumanizes, or calls for exclusion of a protected group, or that runs dehumanizing or eliminationist framing against a political camp. Criticism of governments, institutions, and named individuals over their own conduct stays protected, however sharp. Every hit rests on an independently fetchable, dated source read in full, and every hit was then re-verified by a second, adversarial pass that tried to break it. Items that failed re-verification are not in this report.
Platform-reported impression counts are floors, and they can rise after we read them. Every figure here is the same snapshot, taken at one point in the week for all 129 items so the totals stay comparable; roughly eight to ten items showed materially higher counts when re-read a day or two later, the largest about a quarter higher. Read each figure as a floor at the time of reading rather than an audience count.
Reach is not measurable everywhere. The 4chan corpus has no view counts and no persistent handles, so reply and image counts stand in for reach and almost certainly understate it. Domain-rank lookups timed out for every Ferret and RVA Mag citation, which is why the Glasgow script and the Virginia flyer item carry no reach figure at all rather than a low one.
Daily prefiltered shortlists exist for five of the seven days in the window. The database covers the whole window and the hunt queried it directly, so the gap is in our shortlist files, not in the database the hunt queried. We did not cover the last few hours before the window closed.
Coordination scoring leans on shared semantic payload, a shared novel claim, coined term or fabricated detail, except where we can identify an organizing hub. One script this week has one. The others record convergence we can see and an organizing link we cannot establish, and those are different findings.
No hit-rate or prevalence claim here may be read as a comparison across ideological lanes. That comparison requires a lane-tier sample for every lane compared, over a common platform footprint. We did not draw that sample this pass.
Five factors, each scored 1 to 5: reach (R), toxicity (T), coordination (C), mainstreaming risk (M), and harm potential (H). They combine as (R·T·C·M1.3·H1.5)1/5.8: multiply all five, with mainstreaming risk raised to the 1.3 power and harm potential to the 1.5 power because those two carry the most real-world weight, then take the 5.8th root. The 5.8 is the sum of the weights (1 + 1 + 1 + 1.3 + 1.5), which brings the result back onto the 1-to-5 scale. Multiplying instead of adding means no single factor can carry a score alone. P1 starts at 4.0, P2 at 3.0, P3 at 2.0. Coordination scores above the floor only on real signals: a named hub, near-duplicate phrasing, synchronized timing, or a confirmed bridge between actors.
Full-schema agreement: 78% as of 2026-07-27